Today it has been revealed that next year will see IFSEC move to a brand new dateline of 19 - 21 May and welcome three prestigious events alongside it at ExCeL London; Security & Counter Terror Expo ( ...
13 Feb 2019 Julie Urban
Stay up to date with the most current, relevant, and credible training in the industry with BlackBag's comprehensive multi-device investigation training course: Digital Forensic Basics. Whether first learning the fundamentals forensic investigation techniques or interested in seeing BlackBag’s tools in action, this course is an excellent fit for any forensic professional who could benefit from a full scenario-based investigative tutorial, regardless of prior use of BlackBag tools.
07 Feb 2019 Valiantsina Ramanava
Polimaster main line of business is designing and manufacturing of professional equipment for radiation detection, monitoring and control. Our aims are to create progressive technology for the provision of prompt and precise radiation detection, reduce radiological terrorism threat and ensure safety of people everywhere.
Polimaster facilities today include 8 manufacturing, service and marketing companies, wide distribution network and numerous service centers all over the world.
Our product line includes: X-ray and Gamma Radiation Dosimeters, Personal Radiation Detectors, Radionuclide Identification Devices, Radiometers, Radiation Portal Monitors, Mobile Detection Systems, Radiological Laboratories, Chemical Warfare Agents Detectors, Contraband Detectors, Radiation Monitoring Systems, Equipment for Calibration and Verification.
Everyday thousands of industry professionals use Polimaster instruments to protect the environment, individuals and whole nations from the harmful effects of radiation. Amongst users of Polimaster equipment are customs and border control services, police, security agencies, military, first responders and firefighters, nuclear power plants, transport and logistics companies, health care providers.
05 Feb 2019 DHS
In addition to this testing, Echodyne’s solution is currently being used as the primary detection and cueing component on autonomous surveillance towers currently deployed in the San Diego Sector . These towers are being piloted with the potential of incorporation into border surveillance programs.
21 Jan 2019 Mr. Manuel Pinten
2018 NATO Summit Protected Against Drones by Aaronia’s
14 Jan 2019 John Bremner
The growth in drone use has caused an upsurge in near-miss reports and increased the risk of drones disrupting or even colliding with air traffic.
Consumer and commercial drones typically weigh under 10kg and mostly less than 2kg. Quadcopters with four horizontal rotor blades are most common but there are also small fixed-wing drones.
Drones are able to stay in the air for up to 30mins at a time, with quick battery changes and/or multiple drones able to cause persistent disruption. Regulations notwithstanding, drones are certainly capable of flight up to 6000m altitude and up to 8km from their operator and controller, which easily brings them into the same airspace as passenger aircraft approaching or taking-off at airports.
Studies have shown that a drone collision with an aircraft is more damaging than an equivalent energy bird strike, and that drones colliding with aircraft can damage the structure to cause a crash.
Besides the unintentional disruption or collisions caused by drone operators who either don’t know, or choose to ignore, drone safety regulations around airports, there is another risk. From those who intentionally choose to cause disruption.
Consumer drones are capable of lifting small payloads of 500g and commercial drones can carry upwards of 6kg. If a terrorist wants to blow up a passenger plane, delivering the explosives by drone is probably more likely than through airport security on the ground.
There are different technologies available for both monitoring and countering-drones. Monitoring is allowed and recommended. Neutralising drones is still (in most countries) not legally permitted.
Typical monitoring technologies include Radio Frequency (RF) Analysers, Acoustic Systems, Cameras, and Radar. Each has their individual pros and cons and it is recommended that systems purchased for airport drone monitoring are an integration of:
• RF, for identification and triangulation of both drone and controller (if radio signals present);
• Cameras, for visual identification and understanding of threat and intent; and
• Radar, for long range detection, accurate localisation and tracking (also from drone swarms), and drone classification even from autonomous drones not sending any radio signals.
When using radar for drone detection, be it stand-alone or part of an integrated system, it should be micro-doppler radar. Specially designed micro-doppler radars are available that can differentiate birds from drones. This avoids drone alarms caused by birds; a common issue with radar.
Typical countermeasure technologies include, RF Jammers, GPS Spoofers, High Power Microwave (HPM) Devices, Nets and Net Guns, High Energy Lasers, and Birds of Prey. None are allowed due to regulations, but should an exemption be approved, Net Guns have a low collateral damage risk at an airport.
RF jamming, GPS spoofing and Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs) generated by HPM Devices have an increased electronic collateral damage risk at airports but could be used successfully if coordinated and managed correctly.